Transcript [00:00] You know folks, Americans rely on credit [00:01] cards for secure payments and seamless [00:04] transactions, but consumers stand to [00:05] lose it all with the Durban Marshall [00:07] credit card mandate bill. Big government [00:09] mandates favor corporate mega stores and [00:11] allow them to choose how your credit [00:13] card is processed. They might end up [00:14] using untested payment networks that [00:16] could jeopardize your data security and [00:18] rewards. Tell Congress to guard your [00:21] card because Americans lose when [00:22] politicians choose. Visit [00:24] guardyoucard.com to learn more. That's [00:26] guardyoucard.com. [00:28] Paid for by the electronic payments [00:30] coalition. [00:31] >> He's here. He's here. [00:34] Now broadcasting from the underground [00:37] command post deep in the boughels of a [00:39] hidden bunker somewhere under the brick [00:42] and steel of a nondescript building. [00:44] We've once again made contact with our [00:46] leader, Mark. Love them. [01:10] Heat up [01:31] here. [02:04] Hello America. Mark Leavvin here. Our [02:06] number 877381-3811. [02:10] 8773813811. [02:15] Thank you for joining the program. [02:19] Okay. I would like to uh clarify a few [02:22] things on behalf of I think we the [02:25] people. Number one, [02:28] communist China is an enemy. [02:30] Number two, Xi is a mass murderer. [02:36] Number three, Xi wants to defeat us [02:39] economically, [02:41] geographically, and he hopes militarily. [02:45] Number four, [02:48] they have attacked our computer systems. [02:50] They've stolen our technology. They've [02:52] used birthright citizenship to create [02:54] future spies. [02:57] and they have heavily funded the tomalt, [03:00] the uprising, the violence in our [03:02] streets over the last many years. [03:05] Number six, despite their lies and they [03:07] lie for a living, Xi and the rest of [03:10] them, they have given coordinates, [03:14] satellite coordinates to our Islamazi [03:18] enemies in Thran, which they have used [03:22] which they have used to attack our [03:23] bases, [03:25] including in Jordan and Qatar in the [03:27] past, [03:29] resulting in the death of Americans. [03:36] Moreover, [03:37] we are spending and will be spending [03:39] hundreds of billions of dollars [03:42] to counter what they're doing from an [03:44] intelligence, national security, and [03:46] military perspective. [03:48] Our [03:49] private businesses have spent hundreds [03:52] of billions and will spend hundreds of [03:53] billions more to protect their software, [03:56] their data, their AI systems [04:00] from breach and sabotage by the [04:02] communist Chinese. [04:05] The communist Chinese interfered in the [04:07] last election [04:09] trying to get Camala Harris elected. [04:11] They failed. [04:15] We should not make any mistake about [04:18] this. They are an enemy. They are our [04:20] number one enemy. As a matter of fact, [04:24] they are building up their military at a [04:27] level and with a speed mankind has never [04:30] seen before. Period. [04:34] And they are building it up for us to [04:36] intimidate us. [04:39] And so far it's working. [04:42] The Taiwanese government, which has been [04:45] an ally for decades since the late [04:48] 1940s, [04:51] the Taiwanese government, a democracy, [04:56] had ordered [04:58] military equipment and supplies [05:01] over the years to the tune of billions [05:04] of dollars. [05:06] and it's been on hold [05:09] because the communist Chinese have [05:11] decided that that's a red line. [05:14] So even providing allies with support [05:18] is a red line. [05:24] Unheard of 20 years ago, quite frankly. [05:28] Unheard of. [05:31] Let's turn to Iran since everybody's [05:34] been at the United Nations. [05:37] The Islamaza regime still exists. [05:43] The early part of this war was [05:45] spectacular. The first month or so, [05:49] brutal military action taken with our [05:52] allies, the Israelis, two of the [05:54] greatest militaries on the face of the [05:56] earth, [05:57] greatest air forces, no doubt. [06:02] Then we slammed on the brakes. [06:06] We had generals, [06:09] advisers [06:11] who advised the president of the United [06:13] States [06:15] that now might be a good time to sue for [06:19] negotiations. [06:22] In my view, that was the biggest of the [06:24] mistakes. [06:26] And we've been tapping the brakes and [06:28] tapping the brakes on and off again, on [06:29] and off again. Then we came up with our [06:32] economic plan which has been very [06:35] successful [06:37] except the regime still exists. [06:43] We will not be able to contain the Islam [06:46] Nazi ideology. [06:48] This is a civilizational battle. It is [06:50] not a nation state battle. [06:54] That's what we mean by globalism. [06:57] Terrorism is globalist. [07:01] And the Islamazi ideology is globalist. [07:06] Anybody who has 10 minutes of [07:08] understanding [07:09] about what we're dealing with. [07:13] No paper they sign in the end will [07:15] matter. No paper X signs in the end will [07:18] matter. [07:21] These are ideologies, [07:23] communism and Islamism [07:26] that look at the the long game. [07:31] Trump will be gone in a few years. They [07:33] figure the Democrats will be in. They'll [07:37] make much more progress. Our enemies [07:39] will. [07:41] It's just a matter of time from their [07:43] perspective. [07:48] and the bag will be left for our [07:50] children to deal with. [07:56] That's the second point. [08:02] I also wanted to mention Israeli [08:05] ambassador to the United States [08:07] lighter [08:10] lighter. [08:13] He lost his eldest son in the earliest [08:16] days of the battle in Gaza. [08:20] As IDF soldiers were going to building [08:22] to building to try and save lives while [08:24] they were trying to root out Hamas [08:26] terrorists, [08:28] the building was booby trapped and [08:30] collapsed on top of his son and several [08:33] other IDF soldiers. And he was he was [08:35] killed. [08:38] And today another of his sons [08:44] is on life support [08:47] because of a Palestinian terrorist. [08:50] They're all Palestinian terrorists. [08:51] Hamas is Palestinian. Islamic Jihad's [08:54] Palestinian. They give themselves [08:55] different names. The Palestinian [08:58] Authority is is a terrorist and so forth [09:02] because they rammed a vehicle into the [09:05] vehicle in which his son [09:08] in the IDF and a police officer were [09:11] sitting [09:12] at such a high speed [09:16] that severe brain damage was done to the [09:19] ambassador's son [09:23] and the situation is dire. [09:28] The prime minister of Israel Netanyahu [09:31] has gone to the hospital to visit before [09:33] he comes to the United States. [09:39] You see those people over there, ladies [09:40] and gentlemen, every one of them, every [09:43] family is affected by what takes place [09:45] there. [09:46] They're very much like us. They're [09:48] westerners. That's what they are. [09:50] They're Westerners. [09:53] But the Islamists want to push them out [09:55] of the Middle East. They want to push [09:57] them out of the Holy Land. They want to [09:59] take over all the holy sites of Judaism [10:01] and Christianity [10:03] and then destroy them. [10:05] They've done that to the rest of the [10:06] Middle East where we had Christian [10:09] majorities in Egypt, Christian [10:11] majorities in Syria, Christian [10:13] majorities in Iraq, Christian majorities [10:16] even in Turkey, Christian majorities in [10:18] Lebanon, and now there's barely any [10:22] Christians in all those countries except [10:24] Egypt. The Coptic Christians make up [10:26] about 10 to 12% of the population, and [10:28] they are brutalized. [10:31] and the Christian population of Lebanon, [10:33] such as it is and what's left, they have [10:36] been brutalized by Hezbollah, but for [10:38] the fact that the Israelis have taken it [10:41] to Hezbollah, [10:47] the Ottoman Empire that was Turkey, [10:53] brutal, [10:55] Islamic, [10:57] eventually defeated by the British and [11:00] others. [11:03] There was a [11:05] secular government [11:08] that came into power in Turkey. You may [11:10] have heard of Adaturk. [11:13] Erdogan running as a nationalist [11:15] socialist Islamist, a party that he [11:17] created [11:19] been a failed candidate repeatedly. [11:21] Eventually, [11:22] of course, the out ofaturur era has been [11:24] over, but eventually [11:26] he won office in a multi-party [11:30] election and then he systematically [11:34] killed and imprisoned his political [11:36] opposition, [11:38] journalists, police officers and and [11:41] military generals and so forth. Anybody [11:44] who had been there before, [11:46] much like Kmeni [11:48] in Iran, [11:53] he had has invaded [11:57] and take took over about 40% of Cyprus, [12:00] a separate country. [12:04] He is constantly threatening Greece [12:07] by violating their airspace. [12:10] He's constantly threatening the state of [12:12] Israel. And apparently he's our buddy, [12:14] too. And he wants F-35s. [12:22] He's the enemy. [12:25] The fact that he's in NATO is really [12:26] stunning given his very close alliance [12:29] with Putin. [12:32] and he's threatening Greece, which is a [12:34] NATO country as well, [12:38] and our ally Israel and our ally Cyprus, [12:43] because that's what he does. [12:50] I want to talk a little bit more about [12:51] all this and I want to talk about [12:54] Mandami [12:58] when we return. I'll be right back. M [13:01] love in [13:16] you know [13:18] Mees the great Austrian economist many [13:21] of you know [13:23] said we all sound like Marxists now I've [13:25] mentioned that before haven't I Rich [13:29] I would add We all sound like appeasers [13:31] in isolationist now. [13:35] Would you agree with that rich to a [13:36] great extent? [13:39] So maybe the left is one. [13:44] You know what I mean? [13:47] Maybe the left has already won [13:51] because we have a lot of people who [13:53] claim to be conservatives [13:57] but certainly don't sound like [14:03] because uh the so-called populists, [14:09] nationalists, [14:13] formerly conservatives [14:16] are starting to sound like the left, [14:19] at least to me. [14:24] And listen to what people say about this [14:26] war in Iran with the overwhelming [14:28] majority of the American people have no [14:30] direct role whatsoever, [14:32] no fear of a draft for young people [14:34] whatsoever. [14:36] And I think to myself, how the hell? [14:40] How the hell [14:43] did we win World War II? [14:46] Well, we were attacked. Well, Iran has [14:48] attacked us again and again and threaten [14:49] us with nuclear weapons. We have to wait [14:52] to be hit with a nuclear weapon. [14:57] How the hell did we even form an army to [14:58] fight the Korean War, the Vietnam War? [15:02] I mean, I sit here and I wonder [15:09] a gallon of gasoline that's going to [15:11] determine the election. I don't think [15:13] so. There is multiple issues. Nature of [15:16] the candidate, the nature of the [15:17] message, how united and coordinated [15:20] these campaigns are, the strategies that [15:23] are being used and on and on and on. We [15:25] know the history of offyear elections [15:27] about incumbents and presidential and [15:30] the party the president and how they do [15:32] and there's a lot [15:36] in fact let me do this [15:39] I posted about this earlier [15:42] and you know when I post things I give [15:44] them a little thought sometimes a lot of [15:47] thought so I don't just plop them up [15:49] there [15:51] I don't just plop them up there let's [15:54] see here. One moment. Let's see here. [15:58] I'm going to read this to you. [16:01] Give me a second. [16:03] The reason so many people, young, excuse [16:06] me, the reason so many young people have [16:08] moved left, it's because of the failure [16:10] to get our K12 schools under control, [16:13] the radical teachers unions who [16:15] brainwashed the kids. because of the [16:17] failure to get our colleges under [16:19] control and we allowed them to be [16:21] populated with tenured Marxist Islamist [16:23] faculties and DEI personnel because of [16:27] massive legal and illegal immigration [16:29] from the third world and a lack of [16:31] vetting and assimilation [16:33] because of the massively increased role [16:35] of government in every aspect of our [16:37] economy creating all kinds of [16:39] disincentives and financial dislocation. [16:42] So now for some it appears their [16:44] response and their answer is listen to [16:47] the kids and accommodate their demands. [16:50] Yet just two years ago Trump won a [16:52] landslide election and held both houses [16:54] of Congress. But listen to the kids. [16:58] Look, this is a tough election cycle and [17:00] it always was going to be a tough [17:02] election cycle. For starters, we know [17:05] the history of off-year elections for [17:06] incumbent presidents. Obama got his butt [17:09] kicked in 2010 by the Tea Party. I was [17:12] an integral part of it. But they doubled [17:14] down and now look at the Democrat party, [17:16] the DSSE, infiltration of Marxist [17:19] Islamists. They never abandoned their [17:20] radical ideology, but they hit the gas [17:23] pedal. There's certainly things we can [17:25] do better. No question about that. I [17:27] have a list of them, including the lack [17:29] of a decisive victory in Iran rather [17:31] than early on tapping the brakes and [17:33] seeking a premature deal. So be it. [17:36] There's precious little time left. [17:38] Rather than starting postelection doomer [17:41] fingerpointing and positioning oneself [17:43] as if a sage when seeing the obvious six [17:47] weeks before the actual election, how [17:49] about we put our minds and resources and [17:52] efforts toward fighting as hard as we [17:53] can given all that is at stake. You can [17:56] be concerned and say so, but stop [17:59] dispiriting voters before they vote. You [18:01] could be creating a self-fulfilling [18:03] outcome. Shove the predictions. [18:06] Let's get going. [18:09] I'll be right back. [18:16] This is the home of America's founding. [18:20] Call in now. 8773813811. [18:26] >> Madami [18:27] is a Marxist Islamist. He's a Jew hater. [18:32] Obviously, an Israel hater. He's an [18:35] America hater. [18:38] He's an Italian hater. He's an Irish [18:41] hater. [18:43] He's a Polish hater. [18:48] As I told you before he got elected and [18:50] I have told you since, [18:52] he's been working to depopulate New York [18:55] City, all five burrows [18:59] of most ethnicities and most people of [19:03] certain faiths [19:06] in order to create a majority Islamist [19:09] Marxist illegal alien [19:13] city. [19:15] where he and the DSA and his party can [19:19] never lose [19:22] and where they will take full control of [19:24] the city, the financial center of the [19:27] United States. [19:29] Looks like Los Angeles is about to fall [19:32] to a communist. [19:34] Of course, they call themselves [19:36] socialists, but we don't put up with [19:37] that crap here. [19:41] Looks like it's going to fall. [19:47] as one city after the other will [19:50] because our ruling class [19:53] does a lot of talking [19:56] and precious little acting, [20:02] even many of the conservatives among [20:04] them. [20:11] There should be a brain trust by now [20:13] over at the Department of Justice, [20:16] various congressional committees [20:20] to figure out how to address the enemy [20:22] that's already here and how to remove [20:24] them. We have major obstacles. The [20:27] courts which twist the due process [20:30] provision of the Constitution implying [20:32] it to immigration. [20:35] We have a Supreme Court that has done [20:37] grave damage with birthright [20:39] citizenship, [20:43] but we ought to take the easy cases [20:45] first, [20:48] the denaturalization cases. [20:52] In other cases, withdrawing visas and [20:54] deporting individuals. [20:58] We'll do in Congress [21:01] create special courts to handle this [21:03] outside of Washington DC. [21:08] Congress has the power to create judges [21:10] and eliminate judges [21:14] at the lower court level. [21:17] And so the Levvin idea has been to [21:19] create [21:21] a relative handful a small number of [21:24] courts [21:26] outside of Washington DC. And I don't [21:28] mean in the perimeter, I mean away from [21:30] Washington DC where cases can be heard [21:33] and brought [21:37] and at the same time [21:41] push like hell [21:45] if necessary to adjust these laws. Of [21:47] course, there will be opposition from [21:49] the Democrats. [21:51] You got to take them on. You got to [21:52] fight them. If we lose, we lose. But you [21:54] got to have a fight. You got to take [21:55] them on. [22:00] Are they [22:04] the populist nationalists? Boy, do they [22:06] talk a lot. They got more hot air than [22:08] anybody else. They're so busy attacking [22:11] traditional conservatives [22:14] and constitutionalists, they don't seem [22:15] to have time for the enemy. [22:21] In fact, because of what they do, they [22:23] are a distraction. [22:25] Even though they're small in number, [22:32] things need to get done and be done. [22:38] Marco Rubio will reporters at the UN [22:40] today. Cut one, go. I think the Iranians [22:42] are under this illusion that Democrats [22:45] are going to win in November and the [22:47] president will no longer be able to do [22:48] things against them. I just don't think [22:49] they understand our system very well. [22:51] Other countries do, but they don't seem [22:52] to. Uh, in our system of government, [22:54] obviously, Congress, uh, the legislative [22:56] branch is a very important branch of [22:58] government. I served in it for 14 years, [22:59] so I understand its powers, but I also [23:01] understand its limitations. When it [23:03] comes to the national security of our [23:04] country, when it comes to the imposition [23:06] of both sanctions and the use of [23:08] military force, the president has [23:09] extraordinary powers. Every president [23:11] does. he's a commander-in-chief, both [23:12] constitutional and and otherwise, to be [23:15] able to carry out those functions. So, I [23:17] think that the Iranians are [23:18] fundamentally misreading our political [23:19] system. And I think the president made [23:21] it very clear yesterday, for him, the [23:22] Iranian issue is not a political issue. [23:24] It is the fact that for generations now, [23:27] for almost 50 years, every American [23:29] president, and frankly, every country in [23:31] the world for the most part agrees that [23:33] Iran can never have a nuclear weapon. [23:36] But ultimately, no one ever does [23:37] anything about it. And he's going to do [23:39] something about it. and he's doing [23:40] something about it. And you know, it [23:41] comes at a price and at a cost. There's [23:43] no doubt about it. But the cost of not [23:44] doing something about it is [23:46] substantially higher, especially for [23:47] future generations. [23:49] >> And this is [23:51] what is so impressive and courageous [23:54] about what Donald Trump has done, [23:59] taken on the Iranian regime. [24:02] I think he's got a lot of peace and [24:04] doves around him. I think uh [24:08] General Kaine is an Air Force general [24:10] and I've got no problem with the Air [24:11] Force, but certainly no problem with the [24:14] Air Force. [24:16] But maybe there's a different type of [24:18] general that needs to be leading this [24:19] charge. I can tell you Cooper, who's an [24:21] admiral, [24:24] is much more gungho, my understanding [24:26] is, than Kane. But whatever the reason, [24:30] it may be time to change some of these [24:32] advisers [24:34] and bring in generals andor admirals who [24:38] know how to win and want to win rather [24:41] than looking for constant offramps, [24:44] which is what we've been reading about. [24:46] There are no easy offramps. [24:49] They tried theou. I told you that was a [24:51] disaster. It was a disaster. They've [24:53] tried other things of that sort. And [24:56] again, I think that's sort of the doves [25:00] trying to push their perspective and so [25:02] forth. Uh I think early efforts and [25:05] negotiations before they were truly [25:07] militarily defeated and was uh was a bit [25:12] of a uh of a trip up and I think the [25:15] failure to arm these people. [25:18] Um, maybe we're arming some, but we're [25:20] not arming enough if we are is uh [25:23] something that's uh that's a mistake. [25:27] But I'm not going to undermine the [25:28] president or stab him in the back. I [25:30] think his effort here to stop the [25:32] Iranian regime is historic and is [25:36] crucial. And you'll get people who say, [25:37] "Well, really, he should have attacked [25:39] after the midterms as if the Iranians [25:41] are going to wait around with their [25:43] nuclear program." We had Stephen Witkov [25:47] on this program and he broke news when [25:50] he said that the Iranians told him that [25:54] they were within 10 days of having an 11 [25:56] nuclear warheads. Do we have to play [25:59] that over and over again? Mr. Meducer, [26:00] that's what he said, was it not? [26:03] That's what they told him. And our [26:05] intelligence had a lot of information, [26:07] too. So, you're president of the United [26:09] States and you sit on that? That would [26:11] be utterly unbelievable, unconscionable. [26:16] So the threat was imminent regardless of [26:18] what anybody else says. And they had [26:20] thousands of ballistic missiles. [26:23] Once you've reached the threshold of the [26:25] ability to build a nuclear warhead and [26:27] you have thousands of intercontinental [26:30] ballistic missiles and you put one on a [26:31] ballistic missile, you're set to go. And [26:34] then you can blackmail, you can [26:36] threaten. But in their case, they said [26:38] they were going to use them. Now, you're [26:40] president of the United States. You're [26:41] the commander-in-chief. [26:43] The buck stops at your desk. You can't [26:45] ignore that. And this president didn't [26:47] ignore it. And he deserves credit for [26:50] that. [26:51] Not disdain and attacks and [26:55] viciousness and so forth and so on. [27:00] I see we have some Republicans who are [27:01] saying, "We got to get out of this now." [27:04] But they never tell us what to do. What [27:06] do they want to do? [27:09] The cotton run Republicans [27:12] are going to cost us the election. [27:17] They need to stop. They need to stop [27:19] choking. [27:22] Stop choking [27:24] and get tough. [27:27] There's a lot of issues they can run on, [27:29] but they're not. [27:33] They're simply not. [27:36] But they can [27:39] give people the reason to run for you uh [27:41] to vote for you [27:44] and they will and it can't just be the [27:47] other guys are nuts. That's okay and [27:48] that's needed. Don't get me wrong, [27:51] but there's also a lot of good things, [27:55] a lot of good reasons. [27:59] But I do think we're having to deal now [28:01] with a uh a very bizarre [28:06] I don't know if it's an ideology or pro [28:08] or or what it is [28:11] that suggest that 21 year olds or 25 [28:14] year olds have the answers and that we [28:16] need to we need to listen to what they [28:18] say. Of course we listen to what they [28:20] say. They're our kids and our grandkids, [28:23] but they don't have a tremendous amount [28:24] of experience and background and so [28:26] forth. Some of them are largely [28:30] regurgitating what they've been taught [28:32] unfortunately in high school and [28:33] college. It's our job to guide them, to [28:36] teach them. [28:40] Certainly, that's the case. [28:45] We've done them some damage here in not [28:48] controlling our government schools and [28:51] our colleges and universities. I don't [28:53] mean to push our ideology [28:55] or I should better say our philosophy, [28:59] but to stop them from being brainwashed [29:01] by the enemy. [29:05] And after decade and decade and decade, [29:07] this is what you get. Also, we act like [29:10] they're [29:13] like they're weak. [29:16] I can't get a job. [29:18] I can't pay my mortgage. [29:21] All the young people that have gone off [29:23] to wars and have been drafted. All the [29:26] young people who started with nothing [29:27] and built something. [29:30] All the young people [29:33] who went to work doing jobs maybe they [29:36] didn't want to initially do. [29:40] Maybe working hours they didn't want to [29:41] work [29:43] in order to to build a foundation from [29:46] which to to do what they want to do. [29:53] We've got more subsidies, more grants, [29:56] more programs than ever before. [29:58] Apparently, it's not enough according to [29:59] some. And that's what Mey's meant. Like, [30:02] we all sound like Marxists now. [30:06] And when it comes to a war in which the [30:09] vast majority of the American people [30:10] have no role, [30:15] you all sound like pacifists and [30:16] isolationists now. Like it's the 1930s [30:19] before the big buildup. [30:23] >> I'll be right back. Mark love. [30:40] I'm a little uh fed up with the cut and [30:44] run Republicans. [30:46] We got to find a way out of this war. So [30:49] there they are giving aid and comfort to [30:50] an enemy that doesn't want us to find a [30:52] way out of this war. As a matter of [30:53] fact, I think they'll drag it on. If we [30:56] have discussions, they'll drag that on. [30:59] um they may intensify their missile [31:01] attacks at some point. Then we have the [31:03] Arab countries always self- serving. Of [31:05] course, they don't give a damn what [31:07] happens to us. And they're telling the [31:09] president, "No, no, no, no. Don't start [31:10] up again. Don't start up again. This war [31:13] should have been fought to destroy this [31:15] enemy, to replace this regime, to arm [31:19] the Iranian people, to get it over with [31:22] as brutally and as quickly as possible. [31:26] The people will rise up if given a shot, [31:29] if they give him weapons like under the [31:32] Reagan doctrine. The Trump doctrine has [31:34] also been very very important not to [31:38] ignore any further the threats of a [31:41] nuclear thermonuclear war in which they [31:44] strike first. [31:48] No, [31:49] in many ways I have viewed this as a [31:51] peace mission. [31:54] I certainly have. [31:57] We have candidates who are running who [31:59] apparently don't know how to speak. Some [32:01] of them have [32:03] they have spaghetti for spines. [32:08] They're going to lose. There's nothing [32:09] we can do for them. They're going to [32:12] lose. It's the ones who are smart, [32:15] who are principled, who are visionary, [32:19] who are articulate. They will win. [32:23] they will win. [32:26] It was 18 months ago that Donald Trump [32:28] had a historic landslide victory. We [32:30] weren't relying on 25 year olds back [32:32] then, were we, Mr. Medusa? [32:35] And all their advice and so forth. [32:38] We have this element, [32:42] this sort of uh [32:44] socialism light, isolationist heavy [32:49] element. It is exactly what Mey's talked [32:52] about. They sound like Marxists [32:55] and I've added and [32:58] pacifists and appeasers, but that's not [33:01] who we are. That's a prescription for [33:04] defeat. That's a prescription for [33:06] disaster. [33:08] Absolute disaster. [33:13] They say, "Oh, those 1980s principles [33:15] don't work. Those 1980s principles are [33:17] actually based on Judeo-Christian belief [33:20] system, the Enlightenment. They're the [33:23] only principles that work. Let me [33:25] repeat, they are the only principles [33:28] that work. [33:31] You get some fat slob podcasters behind [33:33] a microphone who think they can reinvent [33:36] the wheel when they've really done [33:38] nothing. [33:40] You got others who may work at a think [33:42] tank who think they can reinvent the [33:44] wheel. They collect a lot of money. They [33:47] have a lot of big lunches and dinners [33:48] and seminars. And they haven't done crap [33:51] either. [33:54] They literally haven't. And what are [33:56] they doing today? Are they rallying the [33:58] American people? [34:00] No. They're trying to dispirit the [34:02] American people. [34:04] They're doomers who are already [34:08] already acting as if we've lost trying [34:12] to present themselves as some kind of a [34:14] sage [34:15] and position themselves. [34:18] That's not the way we work here. [34:21] You, Mr. and Mrs. America, me, [34:25] we're on a mission and we've done this [34:28] for many years. We'll be right back. [34:32] This segment of the podcast is [34:34] exclusively sponsored by Pure Talk. Pure [34:36] Talk offers great coverage and can save [34:39] your family money on your wireless bill [34:41] every single month. Go to purealk.com to [34:44] find the plan that's right for you. [34:46] Thank you again for listening and thank [34:48] you so much for this sponsorship. Pure [34:50] Talk is here. He's here. [34:55] Now broadcasting from the underground [34:57] command post, deep in the bowels of a [35:00] hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick [35:02] and steel of a nondescript building, [35:05] we've once again made contact with our [35:07] leader, Mark Leven. [35:13] Hello America, Mark Levin here. Our [35:16] number 877381-3811 [35:21] 8773813811. [35:24] And are you folks aware [35:27] that the Palestinian terrorists family, [35:33] you know, the Palestinian terrorist, [35:36] his family who was killed [35:40] that may well have killed Ambassador [35:42] Lighter son will be receiving a big [35:43] pension from the Palestinian Authority. [35:45] Did you know that, Mr. Producer? [35:49] We have a Teller Force Act in place. [35:54] that was passed in the first Trump term [36:00] and um [36:02] Taylor Force was a [36:05] an American young man, a veteran in his [36:07] 20s. [36:10] He was visiting the old city in [36:12] Jerusalem [36:14] along with another group. I think it may [36:16] have been a rel Christian religious [36:17] group and he was murdered by a [36:20] Palestinian terrorist. right there where [36:23] he stood, [36:25] killed him. [36:30] And so a law was passed by Congress and [36:32] my family had [36:34] a role in pushing for that [36:38] named after him [36:40] that cut funds from the Palestinian [36:42] Authority [36:45] because they were handing out pensions [36:47] to the families of terrorists [36:51] who were killed [36:53] killing civilians including Americans. [37:01] So when you hear an envoy or somebody [37:03] else talk about the moderate [37:04] Palestinians, [37:07] Abbas and the Palestinian Authority, [37:09] that law was passed primarily to address [37:12] him and them. [37:14] And so the European Union keeps pouring [37:17] money into this Palestinian Authority as [37:18] do others. [37:21] And that money is used in many cases and [37:24] in many ways for terrorism. [37:27] for terrorism [37:31] like the attack on Ambassador Lighter's [37:33] son. [37:35] So the killer [37:37] or god forbid the terrorist who attacked [37:41] his son who's had major brain surgery [37:44] and [37:47] unfortunately it doesn't look good. [37:50] He was killed in turn by the IDF. [37:55] his family will be receiving a huge [37:58] pension because [38:02] of the terrorist attack on the [38:04] ambassador's son. [38:08] Now, what kind of a culture is this [38:15] in Gaza where we have a board of peace? [38:18] The word peace and Hamas should never be [38:21] in the same sentence. It's preposterous. [38:25] All kinds of plans in place. $20 million [38:27] to subsidize the purchasing of arms from [38:30] Hamas terrorists. That that can't go [38:32] badly, can it, Mr. Producer? [38:36] I mean, I feel like it's two different [38:38] worlds here. [38:40] One of extreme naivee and the other of, [38:44] you know, terrorists. [38:50] And in the case of Iran, [38:54] when we talk about if they come up, you [38:57] know, with an agreement and we can agree [38:59] to the agreement and we can help them [39:00] rebuild their society, we're going to [39:01] rebuild a society when the regime is [39:03] still in power. Seriously, [39:06] how does that work in my humble opinion? [39:14] Anyway, I find it also, [39:18] let me say, challenging. Can I say [39:20] challenging, Mr. Producer? I think I'll [39:23] say challenging. [39:25] The Iranian president, who in part is [39:27] responsible for the death, the president [39:29] puts it at over 70,000, maybe 100,000 [39:32] civilians, [39:35] accuses [39:37] our president and our country of killing [39:39] their children. [39:41] But that's what [39:43] genocidal m uh uh regimes do. Cut to a [39:47] go. Yesterday, the United States [39:50] president described us as terrorists. [39:54] We have been the victims of terrorism. [39:58] I come from an Iran [40:01] in which our esteemed Supreme Leader was [40:06] assassinated [40:08] without any [40:10] legal Oh, that's amazing. Without any [40:13] legal framework. [40:17] as they're hanging, raping, torturing [40:20] young people. No legal framework. You [40:24] don't understand that, ladies and [40:25] gentlemen. It's called war. You jackass. [40:28] You mass killering bastard. [40:31] >> Go ahead. [40:33] >> Reason. I come from an Iran where in [40:35] truth [40:37] they bombed a school. [40:41] >> They bombed a school. A school was hit [40:43] by accident. Right. [40:46] And so these terrorists [40:48] have funded other terrorists who've [40:50] destroyed schools and hospitals [40:53] by the hundreds. [40:55] By the hundreds. [40:59] But look, they use the same propaganda [41:01] as Politico, as CNN, [41:05] as the New York Times, as MS Now, as the [41:09] Democrats. They use the same propaganda. [41:11] Have you noticed that? Go ahead. [41:15] These children perished. [41:17] >> Enough of you, jackass. [41:20] Enough of you. I've got this clip after [41:22] clip. I've had enough of him. [41:27] Then we have the Syrian president. Now, [41:29] keep something in mind. [41:31] The Syrian president, [41:36] he was the leader of al-Qaeda in Syria, [41:40] responsible for the death of thousands [41:42] and thousands. He's an ally of Erdogan. [41:46] Erdogan [41:49] who wants to use him and Syria [41:54] as a launching point against Israel. So [41:56] he keeps trying to move in tanks and [41:58] troops trying and is slaughtering [42:01] Christians and Jews and other minorities [42:03] on the border that Israel is trying to [42:04] protect these people. They get no credit [42:07] for that. Not even from us. [42:10] The envoy there, the ambassador there, [42:12] Thomas Barack, is a real jackass. And [42:17] I'm sorry, he just is. [42:23] And I've made no secret of that. He is [42:25] basically Erdogan's right-hand man, [42:29] in my humble opinion. [42:33] I speak for myself, of course, [42:37] but here he is, the Syrian president. [42:39] Now he wears a suit, [42:42] you know, starch shirt and a tie. [42:46] Speaking to the Atlantic Council in New [42:48] York yesterday. Cut five, go. [42:50] >> There are uh indiscriminate arrests that [42:52] are taking a place in Syria. Even the [42:55] presidential palace have been uh bombed [42:57] twice by the Israeli army. Our airports [43:00] are being uh bombed uh as well as all [43:04] the uh military airports that we have. [43:07] >> Isn't it amazing? Israel is attacking [43:09] everybody. And yet it's Iran that's [43:11] attacking everybody. [43:13] It's Turkey that has occupied Cyprus. [43:15] It's Turkey that threatens Greece. [43:18] It's Turkey that has killed and locked [43:21] up tens of thousands of quote unquote [43:23] dissident. [43:25] Israel doesn't do that. [43:28] Is it amazing? [43:30] It's amazing. [43:32] It's Turkey, Syria that support and fund [43:35] terrorists and terrorism. [43:40] The problem is Israel so badly [43:42] outnumbered 2 billion Muslims versus 9 [43:46] million Jewish residents. [43:50] Over 50 Muslim majority countries versus [43:53] this tiny little country. [43:57] It's so badly outnumbered. So when their [44:00] speeches at the United Nations or these [44:02] or these murderous dictators come to the [44:05] United States and they sit down at the [44:07] Atlantic Council or some other group and [44:10] some other media outlet, [44:12] there's scores of them. Literally scores [44:14] of them. [44:18] And you've got the ambassador to the UN [44:20] for Israel. You've got the ambassador to [44:22] the United States from Israel. [44:23] unfortunately had to go home as a result [44:25] of an attack on his son. [44:27] You've got the prime minister of Israel [44:29] who's not here yet. He won't have any [44:31] red carpet meeting. I can guarantee you [44:33] on that. And [44:36] then he has to go back because of [44:38] situations that exist in his country and [44:40] he's in a he's in an election. [44:43] They're just badly outnumbered. And of [44:46] course in the media they're badly [44:47] outnumbered [44:50] whether it's Reuters or Politico [44:54] or any of these outlets very very [44:56] hostile to Israel to Netanyahu to Jews [45:00] to America just hostile. [45:05] Go ahead. [45:07] >> To the uh Israeli citizen, uh look at [45:12] the relations that we have in Syria with [45:14] the United States, with the UK, with [45:16] Gulf States, Iraq and Lebanon. They are [45:18] successful and they are not uh those [45:20] relations are not successful with with [45:22] Israel because you're bu you're allowing [45:25] Turkey to create a military presence on [45:28] your border with Israel. [45:32] You're not doing it with the United [45:33] States, the UK, the European Union or [45:36] Lebanon. [45:38] That's the problem. And Netanyahu has [45:41] said we cannot have another Gaza [45:44] situation on our border. We cannot be [45:48] expected, a tiny country to defend [45:50] ourselves on every single border with an [45:52] with these terrorists amassing on every [45:54] single border and coordinating with each [45:56] other. It's not by accident that Erdogan [46:00] is aligned with Iran. Has anybody told [46:02] you that? It's not by accident that [46:04] Qatar is aligned with Iran. Did you see [46:06] those guys uh kissing like like uh [46:10] newlyweds today uh yesterday? Mr. Medusa [46:16] and this guy from series a puppet for [46:18] Erdogan. [46:20] These are realities. This is the way it [46:22] is. I you know, you just got to know [46:28] There's more of this. Cut six. Go. [46:30] >> There are so many questions that are [46:32] part of the past now. So maybe we need [46:34] to update ourselves. [46:38] So I answered this question so many [46:40] times before and it's now I repeated the [46:43] question. I don't believe that it is [46:48] appropriate time to discuss things that [46:50] happened 25 years ago. I was in a [46:52] different age and the conditions in the [46:54] region uh were different and uh they [46:58] were [46:58] >> okay. Thanks for nothing. You're still [46:59] working with Erdogan and he is a terror. [47:02] No question about it. We'll be right [47:04] back. [47:04] >> Mark love. [47:14] >> You know folks, I've been telling you [47:15] for a long time that Pure Talk is the [47:17] best wireless company out there. I say [47:19] that because I actually use Pure Talk. I [47:22] make calls. I send texts. I watch [47:24] videos. I use the unlimited data. So, I [47:26] can tell you firsthand that coverage is [47:28] phenomenal. But you don't have to take [47:29] my word for it. In a recent industry [47:32] survey of over 120,000 wireless [47:35] customers, Pure Talk was the only [47:37] wireless company in the country to get [47:39] five out of five stars in every [47:41] category. Coverage, support, value, and [47:43] data. Stop overpaying for subpar [47:45] service, folks. Join Pure Talk. Join me. [47:48] Just go to puretalk.com/lavven [47:51] puretalk.comlevn [47:54] and you'll save 50% off your first [47:56] month. Make the switch right now and [47:58] with unlimited high-speed data for just [48:00] $34.99 [48:02] a month, you're going to save a fortune. [48:04] Take it from me or from over 120,000 [48:08] wireless customers. Again, that's [48:10] puretalk.com/loven. [48:12] puretalk.com/levin. [48:15] Save 50% off your first month. [48:17] puretalk.com/lavvin [48:19] and welcome to Pure Talk. [48:25] We have a guest, hour three, our friend, [48:27] Representative Randy Fine of Florida. [48:30] Good man. [48:32] Another guy that takes a lot of crap, [48:33] but he's tough. [48:35] We all have to be tough. Margaret [48:37] Brennan. Remember her, ladies and [48:40] gentlemen? Oh, yeah. [48:43] Margaret Brennan. What show is that? [48:45] Meet the defaced. Mr. producer deface [48:47] the nation. What is that? Deface the [48:50] nation. [48:51] Margaret Brennan in October 2024. We're [48:55] going to play what she said then and [48:57] what she says now. Listen carefully. [48:59] Margaret Brennan of Deface the Nation. [49:02] October 2024. Cut seven. Go. [49:06] >> Earlier today, Iran launched its largest [49:08] attack yet on Israel. But that attack [49:11] failed thanks to joint US and Israeli [49:14] defensive action. President Biden has [49:17] deployed more than 40,000 US military [49:20] personnel and assets to that region over [49:23] the past year to try to prevent a [49:25] regional war. Iran is weakened, but the [49:28] US still considers it the largest state [49:31] sponsor of terrorism in the world, and [49:33] it has drastically reduced the time it [49:35] would take to develop a nuclear weapon. [49:37] It is down now to one or two weeks time. [49:41] Governor Walls, if you were the final [49:43] voice in the situation room, would you [49:46] support or oppose a preemptive strike by [49:49] Israel on Iran? [49:52] >> All right. So, she says they're a week [49:54] or two away from having a nuclear [49:56] weapon. Did she not say that, Mr. [49:57] Producer? [49:59] >> Okay. Now, cut eight. We have Margaret [50:01] Brennan. The same Margaret Brennan [50:05] in June 2025. [50:09] Less than a year later [50:11] with Marco Rubio as the guest. Cut it. [50:14] Go. [50:14] >> Weaponization ambitions. [50:17] Are you saying there that the United [50:19] States did not see intelligence that the [50:22] Supreme Leader had ordered [50:24] weaponization? [50:25] >> That's irrelevant. I think that question [50:27] being asked on the media all that's an [50:28] irrelevant question. They had to build a [50:30] point in US intelligence assessments. [50:32] You know that. Yes, it was. Political [50:34] decision had I know that better than you [50:36] know that. And I know that that's not [50:37] the case, [50:38] >> but I'm asking you whether the order was [50:39] given. [50:40] >> And the people who say that [50:41] >> it doesn't matter if the order was [50:43] given. They have everything they need to [50:44] build nuclear weapons. Why would you [50:45] bury Why would you bury things in a [50:47] mountain 300 ft under the ground? Why [50:49] would you bury six? Why do they have 60% [50:51] enriched uranium? [50:52] >> You know, in the intelligence assessment [50:54] that it was that Iran wanted to be a [50:56] threshold state. [50:57] >> You know what says I'm talking about the [51:00] intelligence March assessment and that's [51:02] why I was asking you if you know [51:03] something more from March. It's also an [51:05] inaccurate representation of it. [51:08] >> Did she not say less than a year earlier [51:12] at that debate, the vice presidential [51:14] debate with Waltz and JD, did she not [51:17] say [51:19] that they were down to it's down, I'm [51:22] quoting, it is down now to one or two [51:25] weeks time. She said that. [51:29] Now she's bickering with the Secretary [51:31] of State [51:32] last year [51:34] when that first attack occurred on these [51:36] nuclear sites over whether whether there [51:40] was weaponization. [51:43] She asked Waltz, "What would you do? [51:46] We know they're down to one or two weeks [51:48] time. So go Waltz, what would you do in [51:51] the situation room if you were the final [51:54] voice?" And with Rubio, she's saying, [51:57] "Hey, you got to prove it. What are you [51:58] talking about? Weapons, weaponization, [52:00] ambitions and so forth and so on. That [52:03] phrase you used. What does that mean? [52:06] This is the problem with the media. [52:11] They're not news organizations. That's [52:13] not news. [52:16] It's just not. [52:20] It's ridiculous. [52:26] I've got some questions after we [52:28] listened to Cy Booker on CNN yesterday. [52:30] Cut nine, go. [52:32] >> You know, first of all, I just want to [52:34] say the way the president disrespected [52:36] you should outrage all Americans. And [52:38] there's been this unifying. [52:39] >> Who's he disrespecting? What's her name? [52:41] What's her name? I don't remember. [52:42] Caitlyn Collins, who used to be a [52:44] conservative, by the way, used to work [52:46] for Tucker Carlson. [52:50] Go ahead. from every background from Fox [52:53] News on the right uh to MS Now all [52:56] condemning what this president is doing [52:57] with the press, who's banned them from [52:59] the Pentagon, banned them from the White [53:01] House, who's attacked the this precious [53:04] sacred part of our First Amendment by [53:06] using the Justice Department to go after [53:08] reporters in ways that even federal [53:10] judges have said is way out of bounds. [53:12] So, in a war against the First Amendment [53:14] in the press. [53:14] >> All right. Thank you. Of course, he [53:16] never said a word when Obama was chasing [53:19] down AP and tapped into 20 of their [53:22] phone lines back then. None of this [53:25] stuff. So, I want to address this. We're [53:27] going to have to take a break in about [53:29] 50 seconds. [53:31] They call this an abomination. They say [53:34] that we've never seen anything like this [53:35] before. You're going to hear Weissman [53:37] next hour or after the break comparing [53:40] it, of course, to Nazi Germany because [53:42] that's what they do. Uh, and we're going [53:45] to spell it out again. [53:48] But I have a question that I'm going to [53:51] pose because there was a hearing today [53:53] in front of a left-wing federal judge in [53:55] DC [53:57] who did not decide the issue today from [54:00] the bench. [54:02] And I want to dig into this a little bit [54:04] more deeply. We'll be right back. [54:08] You know, folks, I've been telling you [54:10] for a long time that Pure Talk is the [54:12] best wireless company out there. I say [54:14] that because I actually use Pure Talk. I [54:16] make calls, I send texts, I watch [54:18] videos, I use the unlimited data. So, I [54:21] can tell you firsthand that coverage is [54:23] phenomenal. But you don't have to take [54:24] my word for it. In a recent industry [54:26] survey of over 120,000 wireless [54:30] customers, Pure Talk was the only [54:31] wireless company in the country to get [54:33] five out of five stars in every [54:35] category, coverage, support, value, and [54:38] data. Stop overpaying for subpar [54:40] service, folks. Join Pure Talk. Join me. [54:43] Just go to [54:43] puretalk.com/levin.puralk.com/levn [54:48] and you'll save 50% off your first [54:50] month. Make the switch right now. And [54:53] with unlimited high-speed data for just [54:55] $34.99 [54:57] a month, you're going to save a fortune. [54:59] Take it from me or from over 120,000 [55:02] wireless customers. Again, that's [55:04] puretalk.com/lovin. [55:07] puretalk.com/levin. [55:10] Save 50% off your first month. [55:12] puretalk.com/lavvin. [55:14] And welcome to Pure Talk. [55:16] >> Mark Levvin, America's mentor of [55:19] conservatism. call now at 877381-3811. [55:25] >> Now, you're very quick to talk about how [55:27] banning how it's we've never seen [55:29] anything like this and so forth and so [55:30] on. Of course, we've seen a lot worse as [55:32] I've discussed over and over again and [55:34] is in my book on freedom of the press. I [55:36] write these books for a reason. [55:40] We have people who don't write their [55:42] books. They have they edit their books [55:45] or maybe they'll write part of their [55:46] books and they line up for attention. [55:48] said, [55:50] "Some of them I like the books, some of [55:53] them I don't." But this argument that [55:56] the First Amendment grants press access [55:58] to the White House has some serious [56:01] hurdles. If the judge is going to be [56:03] serious about it, I want you to think [56:04] about this. What are the credentials for [56:07] getting a White House pass? And are they [56:10] legitimate at all? If so, does a judge [56:14] determine whether the credentials meet a [56:16] freedom of the press test? [56:18] And what is the test? And why should a [56:21] judge make that determination? What [56:23] about press outfits that are denied [56:26] access because of say contentbased [56:28] decisions? For example, let's say it's a [56:31] clan group with a newsletter or Hamas [56:33] group with a podcaster. [56:36] With the explosion of new media [56:37] platforms, how is this to be dealt with? [56:40] Audience size? Surely not. Politico is [56:44] essentially a website. CNN is a [56:46] low-rated cable channel. MS Now is not [56:49] much better. All three are highly [56:51] partisan for Democrats. [56:54] How can some of these press outfits get [56:56] access while others are denied? But how [56:59] can all be granted press access when [57:01] even as a practical matter, it would be [57:03] impossible to fit them all in the White [57:05] House press room? A judge who decides [57:08] access is press freedom will have a lot [57:12] of explaining to do. [57:15] It doesn't mean he won't try, but we [57:17] shall see if that is the case, whether [57:19] it makes any sense. [57:21] Then we have somebody called Nostra [57:23] Dummy. Get someone to explain to you [57:25] slowly how the White House press poll [57:27] works and always has worked. And what [57:29] they're talking about is one press [57:31] person, [57:32] you know, who covers it and then No, [57:35] we're talking about a press conference, [57:36] a-hole, you You don't even [57:38] understand what we're talking about. [57:40] Nostra dummy. [57:42] You understand? [57:44] Lots of dummies out there. They're [57:46] online. They use fake names, [57:50] but we notice. [57:52] We still notice them. [57:56] Then we have this guy Viceman. [58:00] Remember Viceman? [58:02] He was on the Mueller staff. Remember, [58:04] as a prosecutor, [58:06] remember he was also a top lieutenant [58:10] to James Comey years ago when he was FBI [58:13] director. viceman and now he's shown his [58:16] true colors. He's a radical left-wing [58:18] hack. He's a ghoul. [58:21] He's all these things. He should never [58:23] been anywhere near the FBI unless he was [58:25] under investigation. Should never been [58:27] anywhere near the prosecutor's office [58:28] unless he was being charged. [58:31] But that's okay. MS Now brings him on [58:34] the other day. And here's his genius. [58:36] Hat tip media research center. Cat 10 [58:39] go. Um, I I wanted to just take a quick [58:42] moment to point out something about the [58:45] president reaching for something that is [58:47] so blatantly unconstitutional and for [58:50] people to understand it is not about CNN [58:54] or MSN Now or Politico. It is about the [58:57] right of people to get the news and to [59:00] hear the news. [59:00] >> No, it's not about the right of people [59:02] to get the news and hear information. [59:06] They can still report all the news that [59:08] they want. they can get all of the [59:09] information that they want [59:14] just because they don't have a special [59:15] place in the press room. [59:20] But keep in mind the questions that I [59:22] raised. How is this decided? And with [59:24] new media, and there's so much new [59:26] media, on what basis are people cut out [59:29] cuz you can't have everybody go ahead. [59:32] choose. In the 1930s in Germany, William [59:37] Shyer and other foreign journalists were [59:41] required by the German [59:42] >> weird accent, doesn't he, Mr. Medusa? [59:46] >> I'd say has a weird accent. Go ahead. [59:48] >> Um, when they were reporting on the [59:51] growth of national socialism of the Nazi [59:54] party. [59:54] >> Well, let me tell you something, Andrew. [59:58] When Franklin Roosevelt was president, [60:01] your great hero, [60:05] radio companies back then got a [60:07] three-year license from the government. [60:09] He cut it to 6 months and he put his own [60:13] media campaign person at the head of [60:15] what was called the Federal Radio [60:17] Commission. They changed it to Federal [60:19] Communication Commission [60:23] and they threatened NBC and CBS [60:28] with pulling their licenses. [60:31] And in fact, NBC's president put out a [60:33] statement that we will in fact support [60:35] the New Deal. Did you know that, Andrew? [60:39] That was the 1930s actually. [60:43] Yes, it was. [60:46] That's right. [60:48] What do you make of the press covering [60:50] up the Holocaust in the 1940s there? [60:54] Andrew Weissman [60:56] in part at the request of Franklin [60:58] Roosevelt. What do you think of that [61:00] one? Andrew. [61:02] Andy. Let's call him Andy. Would he like [61:04] Andy, Mr. Producer? [61:07] Go ahead. [61:09] >> Wired before they could report to their [61:11] home countries. [61:13] >> What would you think about Franklin [61:14] Roosevelt? [61:16] the chairman in the Senate, excuse me, [61:19] Kalera chairman in the Senate, [61:22] a special Democrat committee. They [61:24] control all the government back then. [61:27] And they insisted that the Western Union [61:30] Telegraph Company provide all their [61:32] telegraphs over a period of time to the [61:36] committee Democrats so they could review [61:39] them for communications. [61:41] They objected to the subpoenas, [61:45] but then they relented. [61:48] They sent in 20 government officials [61:51] into the headquarters of the Western [61:53] Union Company [61:55] to go over telegraphs and they looked at [61:57] millions of them over the course of [61:59] years to see what lobbyists were saying, [62:02] senators and congressmen were saying, [62:03] all worth all under the great Franklin [62:06] Roosevelt. What do you think of that, [62:09] Andy? [62:10] Does that bother you? Here's another one [62:13] with the great Franklin Roosevelt. He [62:15] unleashed the Internal Revenue Service [62:18] against the man who founded and owned [62:20] the Philadelphia Inquire, which was [62:22] considered a Republican newspaper in [62:24] Philadelphia. [62:28] Name was Annenburgg. [62:33] And they tried to break Annenburgg [62:35] because his editorials weren't [62:37] supporting the New Deal. [62:40] That was the 1930s in America. Andy, did [62:44] you know that, Andy? I thought I would [62:46] tell you about that. Andy. Oh, yes. Oh, [62:49] yes. [62:51] Want to hear more? [62:53] Barack no house. Bonito Obama unleashed [62:56] the FBI against the Associated Press. [62:59] Yes, he did. Yes, he did. And the FBI [63:04] tapped into 20, count them, 20 of their [63:06] phone lines. That's right. That's right. [63:08] They did. They did. [63:11] They went after James Ryzen [63:14] of the New York Times, a lefty editorial [63:16] writer. Oh, yes, they did. And [63:21] Fox News's James Rosen who texts me from [63:24] time to time. He wants radio time. [63:27] Anyway, [63:28] they went after him. They went after his [63:30] parents. They did all those things. [63:34] Yes. [63:36] That was in the 2000s. And I don't [63:38] remember Andy Viceman Viceman. I don't [63:41] remember Andy Viceman saying anything [63:44] about it. I don't remember Cory Booker [63:47] saying anything about it. I don't [63:49] remember anybody saying anything about [63:51] it except me. [63:54] Whole chapter in my book. [63:58] All these things happened. [64:00] Should we go to Woodro Wilson, the great [64:03] Woody Wilson? [64:05] Oh yes. He imprisoned scores, hundreds [64:10] of so-called journalists. He did the [64:14] first progressive president. Well, I'd [64:15] say Theodore Roosevelt was. I don't [64:17] think the White House quite under [64:18] understands what Theodore Roosevelt [64:20] stood for, but nonetheless, nonetheless, [64:24] Woody Wilson. [64:26] Yes, he imprisoned reporters. He did. [64:30] And he imprisoned just people who [64:32] disagreed with his agendas. 1,200 of [64:34] them. sent to federal prison. It's true. [64:38] It's true. [64:40] It's true. [64:43] Want to get into wire taps? You want to [64:45] get into John Kennedy and LBJ? Huh? Huh? [64:48] Do you? Do you, Andy? Do you, Cory? I'll [64:52] be right back. [64:53] >> Mud loving. [65:01] You know, folks, I've been telling you [65:03] for a long time that Pure Talk is the [65:05] best wireless company out there. I say [65:07] that because I actually use Pure Talk. I [65:09] make calls, I send texts, I watch [65:11] videos, I use the unlimited data. So, I [65:14] can tell you firsthand that coverage is [65:16] phenomenal. But you don't have to take [65:17] my word for it. In a recent industry [65:19] survey of over 120,000 wireless [65:23] customers, Pure Talk was the only [65:24] wireless company in the country to get [65:26] five out of five stars in every [65:29] category, coverage, support, value, and [65:31] data. Stop overpaying for subpar [65:33] service, folks. Join Pure Talk. Join me. [65:36] Just go to puretalk.com/laven. [65:39] puretalk.com/levin [65:42] and you'll save 50% off your first [65:43] month. Make the switch right now. And [65:46] with unlimited high-speed data for just [65:48] $34.99 [65:50] a month, you're going to save a fortune. [65:52] Take it from me or from over 120,000 [65:55] wireless customers. Again, that's [65:57] puretalk.com/lavvin. [66:00] puretalk.com/levin. [66:03] Save 50% off your first month. [66:05] puretalk.com/lavvin. [66:07] And welcome to Pure Talk. [66:13] Now, we're working on getting an [66:15] article. [66:17] And this is frightening. [66:20] I just want you to know it's also [66:22] newsbreaking. [66:25] How you doing, Mr. Producer? Any good or [66:26] no? [66:29] Okay. It's from Bloomberg. China, listen [66:33] to me, is holding sensitive F-35 parts [66:38] that were diverted to Hong Kong. [66:44] China is holding sensitive F-35 parts [66:46] diverted to Hong Kong and we're going to [66:48] sign deals with this country. [66:51] It's all they do is steal stuff from us. [66:56] The Chinese government has taken [66:57] possession of potentially sensitive F-35 [67:00] stealth aircraft parts that were [67:02] inexplicably diverted to Hong Kong while [67:05] being sent to the US from Australia. [67:07] People briefed on the incident said [67:09] they're reporting [67:11] UPS was shipping a cockpit, canopy, and [67:15] weapons bay door from an Australian [67:17] military F-35 [67:20] that was being sent to the US for [67:21] inspection and possible repair and [67:23] disposal in late May, according to the [67:26] people who asked not to be identified [67:29] discussing private matters. [67:32] And the report also says China has yet [67:34] to return the F-35 parts to the United [67:37] States. [67:41] So news which we reported on initially [67:44] but now we know they have parts [67:48] news. And here is Xi Ping at a state [67:51] dinner [67:55] in Washington DC on a three-day visit. [68:00] Unfortunately, I've have been opposing [68:02] the handing out of F-35s like their [68:05] lollipops. Those F-35s, the technology [68:07] is cutting edge. [68:10] It's taken decades and tens of billions [68:13] of dollars to develop it. [68:17] So, uh [68:22] somebody did something as this thing was [68:25] working through the uh the delivery [68:28] chain here. Somebody did something. [68:32] I mean, these are top top top secret [68:35] things, right? [68:37] How many of you have heard this today [68:39] that they have the they have these [68:41] parts? [68:43] It's not out there, is it, Mr. Padus? [68:46] Despite the fact that Bloomberg's [68:47] reported on this, it's not headlined [68:50] anywhere. What the hell's going on? [68:53] Does everybody want to be invited? You [68:55] know what it is? They want to be invited [68:56] to the state dinner with Xi. It's too [68:58] late. They're already eating. Too late. [69:02] You know, I've never been invited to a [69:03] state dinner. I don't want to go to a [69:06] state dinner. [69:10] I go to Costco. I get the hot dog and [69:12] the soda. Same price it's been for 412 [69:14] years. But that's not why I get it. It's [69:16] cuz I like it. It's a great hot dog. [69:21] Now I get my Diet Coke. Get my hot dog. [69:24] Put a little spicy Golden's mustard or [69:27] whatever they have in the pump there. A [69:28] little bit of ketchup on it. Please [69:30] don't cringe. I buy food to eat ketchup. [69:32] That's what I do. [69:35] Fantastic. [69:37] And you know what's back? They had [69:39] stopped at the uh [69:42] they're not donuts, but those long I [69:43] forget the name of them. [69:46] Yes, the churros. Don't you love those? [69:49] They're back. [69:52] I can't eat them right now cuz I'm [69:53] trying to lose a little bit of weight, [69:55] but they're back. The churros are back. [70:00] So people who say, "I can't afford a [70:02] burrito. I can't afford a burrito." [70:04] Well, you can get a big foot long hot [70:06] dog or a nice roll [70:10] with a soda for a buck 50 at Costco. All [70:13] of you. [70:15] And you can get a you get pizza. You get [70:17] a nice pizza. You can get all kinds of [70:19] stuff there. [70:21] Very very well priced. You can get 25 [70:24] pounds of grapes for like a dollar and a [70:26] half. You know, Mr. Produce, [70:28] but I'm serious. [70:31] You know, the burritos, the young people [70:33] can't afford burritos. I'm so sick [70:37] of these phony conservatives who just [70:40] want more government, who sound like [70:43] Marxists [70:44] who keep preaching this crap [70:47] and making [70:49] our youngest generation [70:52] weaker and weaker and weaker. [70:56] Not all of that generation, but too [70:59] many. Their expectations are nowhere. [71:03] Their expectations are nowhere. [71:06] And they don't want to take jobs that [71:08] aren't the job that they were expecting [71:10] and hoping when they get out of college [71:12] and so forth. Bluecollar jobs, industry [71:16] jobs are robust right now. people are [71:20] taking them and so but the jobs when you [71:22] get out of college aren't. And so we [71:23] have people who expected with their [71:26] polyside degrees I guess to walk into [71:28] Goldman Sachs. I don't know. We'll be [71:30] right back. [71:35] >> He's here. He's here [71:39] now. Broadcasting from the underground [71:41] command post. Deep in the fowls of a [71:44] hidden bunker, somewhere under the brick [71:46] and steel of a nondescript building, [71:49] we've once again made contact with our [71:51] leader, Mark Len. [71:57] All right, America, [72:00] Mr. Producer has [72:03] found the story. [72:05] Although I have to the font is so small. [72:09] Let me take this here. [72:11] Hold on one second, folks. [72:15] Let me see if my reading glasses will [72:17] help me. [72:20] Hold on. Pull this nice and close. Here [72:23] we go. [72:24] This is from [72:27] What's it from? Rich military. What? [72:30] Military.com. [72:33] Pentagon investigating how F-35 fighter [72:35] jet parts bound for the US were diverted [72:39] to Hong Kong. [72:41] God, this is crazy. Lawmakers want [72:44] answers and be growing concerns that [72:46] China could have access to key [72:47] components of the classified weapon [72:49] system. We now know from Bloomberg that [72:51] that's exactly what they have. [72:55] All that investment, [72:57] all that time, all that knowhow. This is [73:00] how the communist Chinese do it. [73:05] I don't [73:09] Everybody wants to be at the state [73:10] dinner tonight except me, I guess. Mr. [73:12] Producer, [73:17] lawmakers on Capitol Hill have launched [73:19] an inquiry into reports that sensitive [73:20] F-35 fighter jet technology was somehow [73:23] sent to Hong Kong this summer in an [73:26] unexplained mishap. [73:29] The incident has raised concern over the [73:31] possibility that Hong Kong, a special [73:33] administrative region of China, which [73:36] has become an increasingly US adversary, [73:41] could have access to key components of [73:43] the highly classified weapons system. [73:47] This is a big damn deal. [73:51] The report claims an intermediary was [73:54] transporting the parts on behalf of [73:55] manufacturer Lockheed Martin. It's not [73:58] clear why the equipment was rerouted to [74:00] Hong Kong or who has possession of it [74:03] now. Well, number one, somebody [74:06] purposely sent it to the communist [74:07] Chinese in Hong Kong. And number two, [74:10] the Chinese had the possession of it. [74:13] Military.com reached out to the [74:15] Pentagon's F-35 joint program office for [74:18] further details of the diverted F-35 [74:21] parts, asking specifically [74:24] how it could happen and whether national [74:27] security could be a risk by having [74:29] sensitive military jet components in the [74:31] hands of the of China. [74:34] quote, "The F-35 Joint Program Office [74:37] and Office of the Secretary are aware of [74:39] a shipment issue of uncserviceable F-35 [74:43] two components. Doesn't matter if [74:45] they're unserviceable." [74:47] The office told military.com, "We are [74:50] actively working with US authorities and [74:52] industry partners to retrieve these [74:54] components, investigate the incident, [74:56] place safeguards to avoid future [74:58] occurrences." [75:00] You know what they'll do here is blame [75:01] Hegset who has nothing to do with it. [75:03] This is how it works. You're the [75:05] secretary of war. Things are supposed to [75:07] be handled as a matter of routine all [75:10] over the world. As it's you, Hex, we're [75:13] going to impeach you. [75:17] Lockheed said in a statement [75:20] because it was Lockheed that sent it. [75:23] Excuse me. Kalera, our teams handle [75:25] every shipment with the utmost diligence [75:27] and safeguards. No, you didn't. Not that [75:30] shipment. [75:31] to ensure the integrity of the F-35 [75:33] program and the security of our allied [75:35] partners. [75:37] What was in the shipment? The shipment [75:38] reportedly included one of the jet's [75:40] cockpit canopies, which contains stealth [75:43] technology that only the United States [75:45] and its allies can access. Well, not [75:47] anymore. [75:49] Not anymore. [75:52] It's an acrylic bubble that tops the [75:54] cockpit and is coated with a thin layer [75:56] of transparent radar absorbent material [75:59] that helps hide the plane from enemy [76:01] radar. The incident has led to a series [76:04] of inquiries and briefings among [76:07] congressional lawmakers and staff [76:09] serving on key national security [76:11] committees. Many are concerned an [76:14] adversary could study the parts and [76:15] potentially copy or reverse engineer the [76:18] technology for their own use. Well, of [76:19] course they will. [76:22] The shipment's unexpected diversion to [76:25] Hong Kong would have brought it under [76:27] Beijing's command, which has in recent [76:30] years kept a tight hold on Hong Kong. [76:32] Yes, I'll say there are strict national [76:35] security laws that allow Chinese [76:37] authorities to influence Hong Kong's [76:39] political system and crack down on [76:41] dissident. [76:44] According to the Air Force description, [76:48] the canopy's thin layer of stealth [76:51] protection can degrade over time, [76:53] prompting a process of repair [76:55] replacement parts for the more than [76:57] 1,300 fighter jets produced for the US [77:00] and its allies. [77:02] Australia operates a number of [77:04] maintenance depots for the jet, but none [77:06] are capable of repairing canopies. F-35 [77:09] manufacturer Lheed Martin manages the [77:12] program overall and the overall supply [77:15] chain and uses commercial shipping [77:17] providers to transport parts. [77:20] Yeah. But for it to make a [77:24] a change of route to Hong Kong that [77:27] that's obviously intentional. There's no [77:30] mistake there. [77:32] I don't think we have too many F-35s in [77:34] ch in communist Chinese controlled Hong [77:36] Kong. Do you, Mr. producer [77:40] the F-35 program which includes the US [77:43] and other nations including the UK, [77:45] Australia, Denmark, Norway and Poland [77:48] and we should add Saudi Arabia and [77:51] Turkey want some too as an unprecedented [77:54] way of managing aircraft parts. [77:57] Countries have access to a shared pool [77:59] of spare parts that are stored around [78:00] the world. Although the Department of [78:03] Defense has stepped up oversight of the [78:04] F-35 supply chain in recent years, [78:07] Lockheed actually accounts for the spare [78:09] parts in the pool. In a GAO report from [78:13] 2023, more than 1 million F-35 spare [78:16] parts were found to have gone missing in [78:18] the past 5 years. [78:24] Yeah, I think the government should [78:25] control uh AI, don't you, Mr. Medusa? [78:30] What could possibly go wrong? [78:34] The F-35 fighter jet program is on a [78:36] track to be the world's costliest. The [78:39] Pentagon expected to spend almost $2 [78:41] trillion over the course of the [78:43] program's lifespan. [78:46] Yeah. And that's why you don't just give [78:48] these jets away. [78:51] Now the countries mentioned there are [78:53] allies I believe they're all NATO [78:56] but to start giving them away to Arab [78:58] countries and Turkey and so no way no [79:00] way that my view there's simply no way [79:02] we ought to be doing that particularly [79:04] now where we have missing parts and we [79:06] have to figure out what the hell's [79:07] happened to them [79:10] and um [79:14] time will tell. And then the Bloomberg [79:17] headline is China's holding sensitive [79:18] F-35 parts diverted to Hong Kong. And [79:20] they haven't given them back, ladies and [79:22] gentlemen. This has gone on since May. [79:24] They haven't given them back. Now, while [79:27] it's true they spy on us and we spy on [79:29] them. I don't care. [79:33] This isn't about relativity. This is [79:34] about the good guys versus the bad guys. [79:36] We're the good guys. They're the bad [79:38] guys. [79:41] That's the bottom line. [79:45] M [79:47] I'll be right back. [79:49] >> Much love in [80:04] Welcome back, America. We have our fan [80:06] representative or our friend uh who I'm [80:09] a fan of, Randy Fine. Randy, where is [80:12] your district again? Can you remind me? [80:16] >> So, I don't represent Orlando and I [80:18] don't represent Jacksonville, but I [80:20] represent just about everything in [80:21] between. So, and thanks for having me [80:23] on, Mark. [80:24] >> That's a big damn district. [80:26] >> It is. It's bigger than Connecticut. [80:29] >> Well, so is most things in many ways, I [80:31] might add. But anyway, it's it's a [80:33] pleasure to have you on. I wanted to ask [80:36] you a question. you you you know [80:38] Ambassador Lighter and now his he has a [80:41] second son who could well be facing [80:44] death from what I'm seeing here. I pray [80:45] not. Uh attacked by a Palestinian [80:49] terrorist. You know we say Hamas, [80:51] they're all Palestinian terrorists. [80:53] Um and what Abbas does, the so-called [80:57] moderate Palestinians, the Palestinian [80:59] Authority, is they reward the [81:01] terrorists, [81:03] especially when they're killed, as this [81:04] one was. their families with these huge [81:07] pensions and we have the Taylor Force [81:10] Act that says none of our money is [81:11] supposed to go for this. [81:14] You know, this is a whole ideology, a [81:16] whole culture. It is a death cult over [81:18] and over again. Meanwhile, we've a board [81:20] of peace so-called with Hamas. We've got [81:23] uh people who are trying to uh to tell [81:25] the Israeli Jewish u citizens there that [81:29] uh they have to limit their they're um [81:32] they're they're moving into and building [81:34] homes even in the in the in the zone in [81:37] which they're free to under the Oslo [81:38] Accords. What do you make of all this? [81:41] >> Well, look, my heart breaks for [81:43] Ambassador Lightner. He's already lost [81:45] one son in service to saving Western [81:48] civilization. Because make no mistake, [81:50] you've been to Israel. I've been to [81:52] Israel. The holiest sites in the [81:54] Christian faith are protected by the [81:57] Jews. And thank God for that. I mean, I [81:59] have friends who've been to Bethlehem [82:01] and they can tell the difference between [82:03] the Christian sites that are protected [82:05] by the Jews and those that are not. The [82:07] problem with the culture of the [82:10] so-called Palestinians, a term which, as [82:13] you know, was largely popularized under [82:15] the Soviet Union, is it is a culture of [82:18] death. It is a culture of of of [82:20] mistreating women. There was just a [82:22] report today about how women and girls [82:24] are treated in Gaza. Um it it is a [82:27] culture that is fundamentally broken and [82:30] fundamentally incompatible with Western [82:32] values and Western civilization. That's [82:35] why they pay terrorists. And I think [82:37] this is a good reminder of that with the [82:39] horrible tragedy that happened today. [82:41] Let's just all pray for Ambassador [82:43] Lightner's son. [82:44] >> Yeah, it's so terrible. Really, really. [82:47] and he is a sweetheart. He's a very very [82:49] nice man and um born in America. I think [82:53] all of his kids, this this kid as well, [82:55] born in America, just a terrible [82:58] terrible thing. Now, what do you make of [83:00] um the Iranian president speaking in [83:03] front of the United Nations, [83:06] trashing our country? This guy seems as [83:08] cocky as ever, doesn't he? [83:10] >> Well, he probably is. He was allowed to [83:13] come to America. I mean, look, I have a [83:15] statement that I like to say, which is [83:17] from the river to the sea, let's make [83:19] Manhattan UN free. I mean, I think the [83:22] fact that we allow these terrorists to [83:24] come to our country, gallivant around [83:27] New York City, crap all over our [83:29] country, it's just not okay. And for [83:32] this guy to stand up there and make the [83:33] statements that he said, including, by [83:36] the way, that every single Hamas [83:38] terrorist that was killed in Gaza was a [83:41] civilian, is disgusting. And the fact of [83:44] the matter is the UN embraces this kind [83:46] of rhetoric. You could see it in what [83:48] the secretary general said in his own [83:50] speech. The the fact that US tax dollars [83:52] go to fund this organization, [83:55] I just fundamentally disagreed with. And [83:57] if it was up to me, I'd say go meet in [84:00] Geneva, get out of our country. [84:01] >> Yeah, I agree with you. You know, uh, [84:04] decades ago, I I wrote a piece, I don't [84:06] know where it is, on National Review [84:08] talking about get out of the UN. Let's [84:09] start our own institution of democratic [84:12] countries. I'm not the first and the [84:13] last to say that, but it's just [84:16] something we don't seem to do and we [84:17] don't seem to want to do. I mean, to [84:19] have a conga line of these genocidal [84:21] maniacs, [84:23] Israel's always outnumbered like 50 55 [84:25] to one when you count the number of [84:27] Muslim countries and there you got the [84:29] one Jewish state. So, and the media just [84:32] keep regurgitating and regurgitism [84:35] is building on itself, isn't it? [84:38] Well, it just feels like a giant wave of [84:42] it. And and the problem, part of the [84:43] problem with the UN is it's a democratic [84:46] institution where every country gets one [84:49] vote in the general assembly, but made [84:51] up of largely non-democratic states. So, [84:54] you have all of these countries that [84:56] haven't had an election in forever, but [84:59] yet they get a vote to to determine [85:02] who's going to sit on the human rights [85:04] council. The entire governance structure [85:06] of the whole thing is crazy. And the [85:09] fact that we subsidize it and we allow [85:11] it to exist in the United States. The [85:13] fact of the matter is President Trump [85:15] could build some really nice condo [85:18] buildings on that piece of property in [85:20] New York. And um I think there'd be a [85:22] much better use of that land than what [85:24] it's being used for right now. [85:26] >> What do you make of the elections? I [85:29] mean uh is it going to be a tough cycle [85:31] like even in Florida? [85:34] Well, I'm optimistic. I think this comes [85:37] down to turnout and who chooses to vote. [85:40] We know the Democrats are going to vote. [85:42] I saw this last year in my special [85:44] election. Democrats were angry. They're [85:47] going to vote. The question is, will [85:48] Republicans vote? And I think there's a [85:52] bit of demoralization out there. But we [85:54] have to remind people that we're running [85:56] against not people with a different [85:59] vision of America. We're running against [86:02] people who hate America. If you think El [86:05] Say and Elon Omar and Rashid Talib and [86:08] Zoran Mamani, they have a vision of [86:10] America that's different than ours but [86:13] also good, you're crazy. These people [86:15] think America is an evil place and they [86:17] seek to destroy it. So the idea of [86:20] America is on the ballot. And so we need [86:23] our folks to get out and vote. If they [86:26] do, we're going to be fine. But the [86:28] question is, will the media demoralize [86:30] them so much that they decide to stay [86:32] home? That's the question that we've got [86:34] to answer. [86:35] >> Do you think Republicans in the [86:37] aggregate [86:39] are getting four or five selling points [86:42] across, whether it's the economy, [86:43] whether it's foreign policy, and so [86:45] forth? [86:47] >> You know, I I don't know that we're [86:48] always consistent on our messaging. What [86:52] I like to tell people, everyone's [86:54] worried about affordability and and they [86:57] as they should be. No one it it's not [86:59] that the economy is bad. Most people who [87:01] want jobs have jobs that that what's [87:04] frustrating to people is how much it [87:06] costs when they fill up their gas tank, [87:09] how much it costs when they go to the [87:10] grocery store, how much it costs when [87:12] they go out to eat. And what I try to [87:15] remind people is this is all linked back [87:18] to illegal immigration. Prices are set [87:21] by supply and demand. And we have the [87:23] huge source of demand in this country [87:26] that we should not have. Tens of [87:28] millions of people who should not be [87:31] here. And they're competing against you [87:33] for your house, which means your house [87:36] price is going to be higher. They're [87:37] competing against you for your [87:39] apartment, which means your apartment [87:41] rent is going to be higher. We're [87:43] educating their kids in our schools, [87:45] which means your taxes are going to be [87:47] higher. the illegals can't get [87:49] insurance, which means your car [87:51] insurance is going to be higher. And [87:53] Democrats want tens of millions of more [87:56] of these people to come into our [87:58] country, which will make things even [88:00] more expensive. That's one thing I talk [88:03] about. But the other thing I talk about [88:04] is the lack of shared values that we [88:08] have folks coming to our country who [88:10] don't wish to assimilate and and who [88:12] don't share our values and want America [88:15] to change. And we can see it whether [88:17] it's footwashing stations in in Dallas [88:20] or or the call to prayer being broadcast [88:23] in New York City. We want a country that [88:25] our kids will recognize in the future. [88:28] And the Democrats are trying to [88:29] fundamentally change what it means to be [88:32] American. And I I tell folks, if you [88:34] want the same America for your kids that [88:36] you've had, you got to go out and vote. [88:40] >> Do you think that's enough of a driving [88:42] force? We got to get into this issue of [88:44] affordability and things of that sort as [88:46] well. [88:47] >> The affordability is the number one [88:49] issue that that that people are [88:51] concerned about. But we have to talk [88:52] about what drives affordability and and [88:55] and a big part of it is is excess [88:57] demand. I think people are also [88:59] frustrated about wages. When you have [89:01] tens of millions of people who shouldn't [89:04] be in your country, that's a source of [89:06] labor that drives down wages. Obviously, [89:10] people want the conflict in Iran to come [89:12] to an end. That will bring down gas [89:14] prices. Um, but but we need to remind [89:18] folks, as you have done an incredible [89:20] job of doing, perhaps better than [89:22] anyone, of what the stakes are in Iran. [89:24] Affordability is the biggest thing that [89:26] frustrates people. And we have to [89:28] explain to people again how Democrats [89:30] created this problem and how if they get [89:33] in charge, they will make it worse. Mhm. [89:38] And we may be a point, at least in many [89:41] aspects of our society, that we cannot [89:43] reverse course. When you look at Europe [89:45] and so forth, Randy Fine, if people want [89:48] to help you in your campaign, where do [89:50] they go? [89:52] >> They go to votefine.com. [89:54] That's our website, voteyfine.com. [89:57] >> Well, let's give him our backing, folks. [89:58] This guy is a standup. He's just a star [90:01] in there, and I really appreciate him. [90:02] Randy, God bless you, my friend. Be well [90:04] and be safe. Thanks, pal. [90:07] >> We'll be right back. [90:11] >> Liberty's voice, Mark Lavven. [90:15] Talk with that voice now. 8773813811. [90:22] How about something positive? [90:25] The president of Argentina is I love [90:27] this guy. I really do. He is fantastic. [90:30] Javier Malay on France's LCI channel on [90:34] Monday [90:36] cut 11 go you don't compromise with evil [90:41] socialism is directly evil it's where [90:44] the idea was taken let's say now that [90:46] it's fashionable all over the world to [90:48] read our greatest literary figure [90:49] Bourhees right well uh take let's say [90:53] the idea to the limit and when socialism [90:56] was applied to the limit it was a [90:58] failure economically socially and [91:00] culturally [91:00] And they also murdered 150 million human [91:03] beings. I have nothing nothing to accept [91:07] from a sinister ideology that's only [91:10] valid let's say in a laboratory. Let's [91:13] say in not even in a laboratory on a [91:17] piece of paper, right? Let's say from [91:20] people who don't have to go out and earn [91:22] a living. let's say let's uh in a [91:24] concrete and real way let's say of what [91:27] it is to generate business to generate [91:30] production let's say no let's say I mean [91:32] uh socialism can only endure living in [91:35] academic cloers because they can live [91:37] without that empirical proof [91:42] let me tell you something he's fantastic [91:44] the president of Chile is a conservative [91:46] as well he's Argentina [91:49] the president of Colombia is a solid [91:51] conservative as Well, Brazil, they may [91:55] get another conservative president who [91:56] then can get his father out of prison. [91:58] They threw him in prison. [92:01] So, when you look at [92:03] these countries south of the border, [92:06] there's a lot of things going on there [92:08] in terms of elections. They are [92:10] rejecting communism and socialism. [92:14] Well, it seems like more and more people [92:15] in more and more states in our country, [92:18] they want it. You know, you want to know [92:19] why they want it? because they haven't [92:21] experienced it yet. [92:24] It's one thing to live off the [92:26] capitalist economic system, commerce, [92:30] and talk about socialism and communism. [92:34] It's quite another thing to live off of [92:37] socialism and communism, the empty [92:40] shelves, the unaffordability, [92:43] the destruction of your civil liberties. [92:45] Have you ever really heard these commies [92:47] talk? these communists and Islamist [92:51] talk. now talking about murdering [92:54] Democrats. Did you hear that, Mr. [92:55] Meduser? [92:57] It's just incredible. Mouth tongue [93:00] killed a 60 to 80 million people [93:03] himself. [93:06] By the way, Harry Anton is the, as you [93:09] know, data analyst over at the [93:11] constipated News Network, CNN. [93:14] He has some bad news for the uh Democrat [93:17] leadership. Cut 12. Go. Well, the call [93:19] is coming from inside the House because [93:22] Democrats on their own leaders. They [93:24] don't like their own leaders. I dare say [93:26] they despise their own leaders. And this [93:27] is the big difference from what we saw [93:29] back in 2018, just before Democrats were [93:31] trying to take back the US House of [93:33] Representatives that fall. Take a look [93:35] here. Net approval of congressional Dem [93:37] leaders among Democrats back in 2018. [93:39] Look at this. Their net approval rating [93:40] was plus 19 points. Hey, that's pretty [93:43] good. Two thumbs up, Cisco and Eber. Now [93:45] we're talking about two thumbs down. [93:47] Look at this minus 12 points. What a [93:51] different world that we are in right [93:52] now. Democrats do not like they despise [93:56] their own leadership. This is a shift [93:57] away among Democrats of 31 points. They [94:00] are 31 points south of the border [94:03] compared to where they were at this [94:05] point back in 2018. [94:06] >> And this is Dond crime. Dond crime. [94:10] >> All right. How about Chuck Schumer? [94:11] >> Yeah. What is driving these numbers? [94:13] Well, take a look at Chuck Schumer's [94:14] numbers. I mean, hello. Okay, Schumer's [94:17] net favorability with Democrats back in [94:20] 2018, right? It was plus 28 points. But [94:22] of course, Democrats did not win back [94:24] the United States Senate during the 2018 [94:26] cycle. In 2018, in 2020, when they did, [94:29] it was plus 53 points. Look at where it [94:31] is now. A Marquette University Law [94:33] School poll out earlier this month, it's [94:34] minus 5 points. Johnny B on the side [94:37] shaking this head. These are no bueno, [94:39] no good numbers. And this is among [94:41] Democrats. Democrats hate Chuck Schumer. [94:44] They don't like Chuck Schumer. And this [94:45] is why you're seeing a lot of Democratic [94:47] Senate candidates on the trail when [94:49] being asked about whether or not they [94:50] want Chuck Schumer to be the next leader [94:52] in the United States Senate for [94:53] Democrats. They'll either try and push [94:55] off the question or say, "No, this is a [94:57] decline, Johnny B, of what?" 58 points. [95:00] 58 point difference from where we were [95:02] back the last time that Democrats were [95:04] trying to take back the United States [95:05] Senate during the 2020 session. [95:07] >> Any historical precedent for this? [95:08] >> Yeah. And this is the whole thing. [95:10] Historically unpopular. There is no [95:12] historical precedent for this. I mean, [95:14] just look here. Okay, the least popular [95:16] Dem Senate leader ever since at least [95:18] 1985 when we can track this. The minus5 [95:22] among Democrats. Chuck Schumer is taking [95:24] the cake when it comes to unpopularity [95:27] for Senate leaders, among Democrats, [95:29] among their own party. This is what I [95:31] keep hitting on right now. This is not [95:32] the overall electorate where Chuck [95:33] Schumer is very much in the red. We're [95:35] talking about among Democrats. [95:37] >> All right, we got it. We got it. They're [95:39] They're squeezing the hell out of this. [95:43] You know why they hate Schumer? You're [95:46] not going to blame because he's not [95:47] radical enough. As awful as that man is [95:50] and has been. [95:53] And I just want people to understand, [95:55] you vote Democrat, you're voting for [95:57] Chuck Schumer if you hate him because [95:58] he's going to be their leader. You're [96:00] voting for Hakee Jeff, too. Then we have [96:02] Representative Robert Garcia. This guy's [96:04] making a name for himself as a jackass. [96:06] Democrat from California. He's on MS [96:09] Now. Listen to this guy. Listen, [96:11] America, because this election will [96:13] determine what kind of country you live [96:15] in and whether you are going to be free. [96:18] Cut 14. Go. [96:20] >> If it's up to me, we be we'd be [96:21] abolishing IC as an agency. They are out [96:23] of control. They are a police state [96:24] force that is now run by Steven Miller [96:26] and Donald Trump. They are there to harm [96:28] people. They have killed people, US [96:30] citizens, people that are here just [96:31] working. They are causing [96:33] >> Tell me how many illegal aliens have [96:35] killed how many American citizens? Hm. [96:40] This guy wants to be the head of the [96:42] House Oversight Committee. Do you [96:43] understand what I'm saying? America. [96:47] Oh, go ahead. [96:49] And it continues whether it's in Texas, [96:51] whether it's in Maine, across the [96:53] country, Minneapolis. And so we have we [96:55] have got to re this agency in. And [96:57] hopefully when we have the majority and [96:59] the ability to stop and slow and [97:01] negotiate budgets, we'll be able to do [97:03] so. [97:03] >> They're going to blackmail and blackmail [97:06] and blackmail the administration. [97:09] They're going to shut down the [97:10] government. They're going to lay the [97:12] foundation for the 2028 election. You [97:15] know, people better wake the hell up [97:16] about this. These people do not care [97:18] about the country. They don't care about [97:20] crime. They rely on illegal immigrants. [97:26] I'm telling you, this is these people [97:28] are nuts. [97:30] Nuts. [97:33] Camala Harris yesterday with her friend [97:35] El Say [97:39] cut 17. Go. [97:40] >> Here's another fact. The attack on DEI [97:44] is an attack on maternal care. [97:47] >> Okay. You know what, ladies and [97:48] gentlemen? This woman is as dumb as a [97:50] doornob. [97:53] The attack on DEI is an attack on [97:56] maternal care. [97:58] What does DEI have to do with maternal [98:01] care? [98:03] All of you women out there, mothers I [98:06] think we call them, don't we, Mr. [98:07] Meduser, [98:10] who are taking care, I assume maternal [98:12] care. What does that even mean? That [98:13] phrase, do you know? [98:16] Does it mean women caring for babies? [98:18] Women caring for their mothers, [98:20] whatever. What does it have to do with [98:22] DEI? [98:24] Go ahead. Let's listen to this. [98:27] An attack on DEI [98:31] to recognize diversity, equity, and [98:34] inclusion is an attack by definition on [98:37] maternal care, [98:39] >> including the need [98:41] to protect black women in connection [98:45] with their pregnancy, childirth, and [98:47] postpartum care. [98:48] >> It has nothing to do with that, you [98:52] dense [98:55] They're trying to find out a hook. [98:57] Anything [98:59] doesn't even make any sense. [99:03] DEI is an attack on black women in [99:07] connection with their pregnancy, [99:08] childirth, and postpartum care. Nothing [99:11] to do with it. There's nothing to do [99:13] with it. [99:16] >> Go ahead. [99:18] >> These are the facts. [99:21] >> Facts. What? What are you talking about? [99:24] Really? I don't understand. [99:27] Go ahead. [99:28] >> At stake in this moment as it relates to [99:31] these midterms. [99:32] >> It's at stake at this moment. DEI is a [99:35] FAB's maternal care. It's at stake in [99:37] this moment. Nobody knows what the hell [99:39] she's talking about cuz she doesn't [99:41] know. [99:43] But there she is with El. [99:48] You see, Jew hatred and anti-semitism is [99:51] really in big. [99:53] It's in with the Democrat party like [99:55] Marxism and Islamism. And it's in with [99:57] the woke right. RIC. We know who they
[100:01] are. They're the scum of the earth, too.
[100:04] That's right. It's in with all of that.
[100:05] Go ahead.
[100:07] >> Who occupies? All right, that's enough.
[100:09] We'll be right back. Much love in
[100:23] All right, let's go to Joseph Keslo or
[100:26] Kelso rather, Washington State, the
[100:28] great KEDO. Go right ahead, please.
[100:32] >> Yes, Mark. About the parts from the
[100:35] military, the sensitive parts being in
[100:37] Hong Kong. I do not do not understand
[100:41] why they're using the UPS to deliver the
[100:43] parts when they're top secret. Why are
[100:46] they not using military personnel,
[100:48] military planes and equipment?
[100:51] >> Well, I don't know the answer to that,
[100:53] but it seems very weird to me, too.
[100:55] Particularly the most uh secretive of uh
[100:59] of parts and so forth and so on. Maybe
[101:00] there's more to this transport that we
[101:03] know that is uh secure, but
[101:06] uh this is this is just a a complete
[101:09] screw-up. And then when you read that
[101:11] over 5 years there've been a many parts
[101:13] that have been lost. I mean I don't
[101:14] understand this at all to be quite
[101:16] frank. And uh you know when people keep
[101:20] wanting more and more government for
[101:21] governmentr run healthcare, we see
[101:23] what's going on in Canada. People you
[101:24] got euthanasia going on up there. uh uh
[101:28] more and more government-run uh
[101:29] healthcare all over the world, how
[101:31] horrible it is, and people are migrating
[101:33] towards this stuff. It's a government
[101:35] that loses a quarter of a trillion
[101:37] dollars a year, it's a government that
[101:39] can't keep track of F-35 parts.
[101:43] I mean, we got a problem. We got a
[101:46] problem because even under the best of
[101:48] presidents, even under the best of
[101:49] administrations,
[101:51] it's so massive. It's so big. And I hope
[101:54] she's enjoying his dinner in his stay.
[101:56] Don't you?
[101:58] >> Yeah. I realize it's not possible for
[102:00] them to try to uh divert uh Xi Jinping
[102:05] from uh returning to China because
[102:08] diplomatic and everything. And you do
[102:10] not want
[102:10] >> Yeah. Well, I'll tell you what, I would
[102:11] have behind the scenes. I mean, he said
[102:13] he's not coming basically if we uh give
[102:16] the uh the Taiwanese the military
[102:18] equipment that they purchased. I think
[102:20] what we could have easily said is,
[102:21] "Well, guess what? You're not coming
[102:23] until you give us our parts back.
[102:26] Very. Yes. And also, I think Trump could
[102:28] put a little leverage by saying, "Okay,
[102:31] you want to keep selling products here
[102:33] in the United States. We could stop all
[102:34] kinds."
[102:35] >> Well, I don't know if he's up to do that
[102:36] right now in front of a midterm where we
[102:38] got all kinds of problems and half of
[102:40] our drugs come from over there. I don't
[102:42] think that's possible. But there are
[102:44] other things short of that that I think
[102:46] uh are possible. All right, my brother.
[102:49] Good call. Thank you, sir.
[102:51] By tomorrow, my man will be here and
[102:54] help me with the get this printer
[102:55] working properly. So, it'll make a big
[102:57] difference. All right, let's see here.
[103:00] We got him. We We only have a minute, I
[103:03] know, but there was something I was
[103:05] looking for. Let me get back to it. I
[103:07] don't think we have time for this. This
[103:09] Sunny Hston on the view yesterday was
[103:12] bragging that she was the hold out jaw
[103:16] who spared New York City's 1991 butcher
[103:19] of Tomkin Square Park Hannibal killer.
[103:24] The jury voted 11 to1 and she was the
[103:27] one
[103:29] to not convict
[103:31] and she was bragging about it on the
[103:33] view yesterday. I've got the audio. We
[103:36] don't have time to play it but trust me
[103:37] on this.
[103:39] bragging about it. Meanwhile, this poor
[103:43] guy on this other jury involving Clancy,
[103:46] he said, "She's guilty as hell, and I'm
[103:48] holding out. I'm not going with the
[103:50] other 11 who are running to make social
[103:51] statements, and he's under attack."
[103:54] We salute our armed forces, police
[103:56] officers, firefighters, emergency
[103:58] personnel, ICE, our truckers, the men
[104:01] and women in Ukraine, the men and women
[104:02] in Iran, the men and women in Israel,
[104:04] and you, the American people. Thank God
[104:06] for you. We'll see you tomorrow.
